banner
banner

22 Jun 2025, 16:49 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Garmin International (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 2072 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 139  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 19 Dec 2017, 14:44 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/29/10
Posts: 2761
Post Likes: +2605
Location: Dallas, TX (KADS & KJWY)
Aircraft: T28B,7GCBC,E90
Michael -

A few questions if you have a moment:

1) What's the full fuel payload?
2) Realistic range at normal cruise speed?
3) What is the normal cruise speed & fuel burn?

Robert


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 19 Dec 2017, 14:49 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 10/28/11
Posts: 1367
Post Likes: +600
Aircraft: V35A, B300
Username Protected wrote:
Yeh, I really didn't get this guy trying to be a jerk to ATC. ATC is your friend and 99% of the time when they ask you to do something inconvenient it's for a safety reason. No win for anyone and lots of risk of something expensive.

I wouldn't recommend doing what this jerk did but if he was in class G airspace, I do think it is within your right to cancel IFR.

A good refresher on class G airspace: http://www.boldmethod.com/learn-to-fly/ ... -airspace/
--------


The controller said hold the 010 heading until below 4,000. So anywhere around Austin isn’t that Class E Airspace and not G?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 19 Dec 2017, 15:29 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 08/24/13
Posts: 9784
Post Likes: +4573
Company: Aviation Tools / CCX
Location: KSMQ New Jersey
Aircraft: TBM700C2
Username Protected wrote:
Yeh, I really didn't get this guy trying to be a jerk to ATC. ATC is your friend and 99% of the time when they ask you to do something inconvenient it's for a safety reason. No win for anyone and lots of risk of something expensive.

I wouldn't recommend doing what this jerk did but if he was in class G airspace, I do think it is within your right to cancel IFR.

A good refresher on class G airspace: http://www.boldmethod.com/learn-to-fly/ ... -airspace/
--------


Canceling IFR wasn't the problem. Refusing an ATC instruction while in controlled airspace was. He couldn't have been in Class G.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 19 Dec 2017, 15:31 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 08/24/13
Posts: 9784
Post Likes: +4573
Company: Aviation Tools / CCX
Location: KSMQ New Jersey
Aircraft: TBM700C2
Username Protected wrote:
I have a small skydrol leak coming from the brake reservoir that I am fixing today. I think it's a fitting. Nasty crap, looks like I spilled paint stripper on a spot on the belly by the nose gear. This thing just needed to be used and exercised. I have all the other systems working flawlessly which is shocking really.


Be very careful around Skydrol. Can cause some persistent skin rashes (from personal experience) and probably worse.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 19 Dec 2017, 16:54 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/30/09
Posts: 6025
Post Likes: +3389
Location: Oklahoma City, OK (KPWA)
Aircraft: planeless
Username Protected wrote:
Yeh, I really didn't get this guy trying to be a jerk to ATC. ATC is your friend and 99% of the time when they ask you to do something inconvenient it's for a safety reason. No win for anyone and lots of risk of something expensive.

I wouldn't recommend doing what this jerk did but if he was in class G airspace, I do think it is within your right to cancel IFR.

A good refresher on class G airspace: http://www.boldmethod.com/learn-to-fly/ ... -airspace/
--------


Canceling IFR wasn't the problem. Refusing an ATC instruction while in controlled airspace was. He couldn't have been in Class G.


Yup. If you truly want to do what you want, you can't be talking to a controller. IMO, Jason has it down: 17,500 and no radio.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 19 Dec 2017, 19:11 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/17/13
Posts: 6652
Post Likes: +5959
Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA
Aircraft: Aerostar Superstar 2
Skydrol nasty stuff. And insanely expensive, too. So just to save some money you need to fix leak! ;) :thumbup:

_________________
Without love, where would you be now?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 19 Dec 2017, 20:21 
Offline



 Profile




Joined: 05/05/09
Posts: 5197
Post Likes: +5214
Aircraft: C501, R66, A36
Username Protected wrote:
Michael -

A few questions if you have a moment:

1) What's the full fuel payload?
2) Realistic range at normal cruise speed?
3) What is the normal cruise speed & fuel burn?

Robert


Full fuel payload is a tad over 1200lbs, I'm fairly certain the empty weight includes 1 pilot so that's 1,370lbs

Realistic range is 1000 ifr and 1100 vfr

Tas cruise is 350kts burning 800pph or 120 gph at fl370

It really has pretty decent performance for its price point


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 19 Dec 2017, 20:28 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/31/09
Posts: 5193
Post Likes: +3032
Location: Northern NJ
Aircraft: SR22;CJ2+;C510
Username Protected wrote:
Full fuel payload is a tad over 1200lbs, I'm fairly certain the empty weight includes 1 pilot so that's 1,370lbs


BEW is without pilot(s); BOW is with pilot(s).

Considering the 501 can be flown with one pilot or 2 crew I doubt W&B begins with BOW.

_________________
Allen


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 19 Dec 2017, 20:41 
Offline



 Profile




Joined: 05/05/09
Posts: 5197
Post Likes: +5214
Aircraft: C501, R66, A36
Username Protected wrote:
Full fuel payload is a tad over 1200lbs, I'm fairly certain the empty weight includes 1 pilot so that's 1,370lbs


BEW is without pilot(s); BOW is with pilot(s).

Considering the 501 can be flown with one pilot or 2 crew I doubt W&B begins with BOW.


That makes very logical sense, 1200lbs is more than plenty. I assume the 2 pilot Citations start with BOW?

Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 19 Dec 2017, 23:45 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/31/09
Posts: 5193
Post Likes: +3032
Location: Northern NJ
Aircraft: SR22;CJ2+;C510
Username Protected wrote:
I assume the 2 pilot Citations start with BOW?


Really you can't assume. You have to read the fine print. Sometimes BEW is used and sometimes BOW is used.

_________________
Allen


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 20 Dec 2017, 12:41 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/29/10
Posts: 2761
Post Likes: +2605
Location: Dallas, TX (KADS & KJWY)
Aircraft: T28B,7GCBC,E90
Username Protected wrote:

Full fuel payload is a tad over 1200lbs, I'm fairly certain the empty weight includes 1 pilot so that's 1,370lbs

Realistic range is 1000 ifr and 1100 vfr

Tas cruise is 350kts burning 800pph or 120 gph at fl370

It really has pretty decent performance for its price point


Huh. That's pretty impressive. Would love a little more range (I do 1200 or so routinely but two 2 hour legs isn't the worst thing in the world).

What's your thought on Thrust Reversers and anti-lock brakes? Seems that about 1/2 the fleet has TRs, but I can't get a handle on how many have anti-lock brakes.

Robert


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 20 Dec 2017, 15:51 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/09/10
Posts: 3634
Post Likes: +860
Location: KPAN
Aircraft: PA12
Username Protected wrote:

Full fuel payload is a tad over 1200lbs, I'm fairly certain the empty weight includes 1 pilot so that's 1,370lbs

Realistic range is 1000 ifr and 1100 vfr

Tas cruise is 350kts burning 800pph or 120 gph at fl370

It really has pretty decent performance for its price point


Huh. That's pretty impressive. Would love a little more range (I do 1200 or so routinely but two 2 hour legs isn't the worst thing in the world).

What's your thought on Thrust Reversers and anti-lock brakes? Seems that about 1/2 the fleet has TRs, but I can't get a handle on how many have anti-lock brakes.

Robert


I thought they all had anti skid brakes but might me wrong.

The TR’s are great for contaminated runways but totally not needed if you operate from clean 5000ft runways. And they are stinking heavy!
_________________
520 M35, 7ECA, CL65, CE550, E170/190, B737
5/19 737
5/18 E170/190
8/17 CL65
3/17 CE500


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 20 Dec 2017, 23:13 
Offline



 Profile




Joined: 05/05/09
Posts: 5197
Post Likes: +5214
Aircraft: C501, R66, A36
Username Protected wrote:

Full fuel payload is a tad over 1200lbs, I'm fairly certain the empty weight includes 1 pilot so that's 1,370lbs

Realistic range is 1000 ifr and 1100 vfr

Tas cruise is 350kts burning 800pph or 120 gph at fl370

It really has pretty decent performance for its price point


Huh. That's pretty impressive. Would love a little more range (I do 1200 or so routinely but two 2 hour legs isn't the worst thing in the world).

What's your thought on Thrust Reversers and anti-lock brakes? Seems that about 1/2 the fleet has TRs, but I can't get a handle on how many have anti-lock brakes.

Robert


Thrust reversers are amazing, I don't have power or antiskid. I don't think it matters too much for a plane this light.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 20 Dec 2017, 23:22 
Offline



 Profile




Joined: 05/05/09
Posts: 5197
Post Likes: +5214
Aircraft: C501, R66, A36
I worked on the plane a bit today.

I cycled the emergency nitrogen brake system multiple times to reset the shuttle valves. Apparently, if this system isn't used, the valves can lock open and drip out skydrol with normal brake function. After cycling the emergency valve, I pumped the real brakes a million times and saw nothing dripping out the drain valve. I replenished the reservoir and topped off the nitrogen. I have a yellow tagged emergency brake handle and the shuttle valves on hand if this didn't fix the leak.

I replaced the pilots side gyro as it didn't want to always slave. Slaved right up with power so I think this problem is solved. I have a spare HSI on board if this wasn't the issue but I think it is.

I replaced the DME LRU with a yellow tagged unit, hopefully this fixes this problem. I know this is a useless instrument but I hate things that don't work.

The radar altimeter is still intermittent but the sender is under the cabin floorboard and I don't have enough energy this week to remove seats and chase this minor issue down.

I lubricated the slow to suck down right boot overflow valve and I think this suck down problem is fixed. I have a spare valve on board too if this wasn't this simple.

Flying out west on Friday. This is a simple, fun to work on plane. I'll report back on my fixes on Friday!


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 20 Dec 2017, 23:38 
Online


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/28/17
Posts: 8379
Post Likes: +10567
Location: N. California
Aircraft: C-182
Back in the 80's, working for a corporate flight operation I flew their 501 and their Lear 35. The 501 was great for short fields that the Lear would'nt work on.

One common trip was to take the boss home on weekends, sometimes using the Lear, and sometimes the Citation. One might think that the Citation was more fuel efficient, but both planes used the same amount of fuel, but the Lear did the trip in less time. Houston Intercontinental to Witchita Falls, 290 nautical.


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 2072 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 139  Next



PWI, Inc. (Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.centex-85x50.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.Latitude.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.SCA.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.camguard.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.daytona.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.