banner
banner

12 Jul 2025, 15:08 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Concorde Battery (banner)



Reply to topic  [ 218 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 15  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane
PostPosted: 08 Mar 2017, 15:23 
Offline



 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/23/13
Posts: 8163
Post Likes: +10522
Company: Jet Acquisitions
Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
Username Protected wrote:
Westwinds are insanely under-appreciated by the market. Mainly because most think it's ugly, is my guess. Pilots are a shallow bunch. Where else can you get a jet with no calendar items, that goes 2500nm, RSVM and has TFE731's that you can literally buy parts for at Walmart? I don't think there's a single jet that delivers that amount of bang for the buck. If there is, I'd be curious to hear about it! :thumbup:


Ain't it the TRUTH! What a massively capable airplane!

True story... years ago the company I worked for sold Stevie Wonder's Westwind (he didn't own it, but was the primary charter customer) and as you might imagine... it was pretty ragged. Needed paint and interior... hard not to laugh.

The kicker... 4 brand new big ol Airshow flat screen monitors!

_________________
Winners don’t whine.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane
PostPosted: 08 Mar 2017, 15:24 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 02/05/15
Posts: 381
Post Likes: +104
Location: KSLC
Aircraft: Divorced: AC690A-10
Dang we have really jacked up James' thread. Sorry. Anyone want to talk about James' new TC?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane
PostPosted: 08 Mar 2017, 15:41 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 03/01/14
Posts: 2282
Post Likes: +2043
Location: 0TX0 Granbury TX
Aircraft: T-210M Aeronca 7AC
Username Protected wrote:
Quote:
If being a Turbo Commander loving, aviation history loving American makes me a racist... then I guess I'm guilty.


This is nuts! Discussing where an airplane is manufactured and assembled is "racist"? Then a sharp turn to "David Duke"? WTF?

Some people are just looking for a reason to be offended. :hammer:

Did Olive Ann name an airplane after David Duke?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane
PostPosted: 08 Mar 2017, 18:09 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/15/13
Posts: 748
Post Likes: +298
Location: Florida-Missouri
Aircraft: V35B
Username Protected wrote:
Travis,

Thanks for the PIREP on the Long Body. Those are the speeds I anticipated. I like the idea of the MU2 and how well it handles rough air. The turbo commander looks better and is A LOT BIGGER which will impact the hanger cost. Tough choice. I like the idea of staying with what I know but I have never flown in a TC so that may need to happen next.

C

A few phone calls would give you hard numbers for hangering a Commander vs. a Marquise.

_________________
__________________________


Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane
PostPosted: 08 Mar 2017, 22:01 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 08/18/13
Posts: 1152
Post Likes: +769
Aircraft: 737
Who thinks the Westwood is ugly? I've been lusting after one forever, that thing is dead sexy. I never looked harder because I figured it'd eat my lunch- maybe I should look harder.

- what's the opex?
- can you RVSM?
- can it be ADSB compliant for 2020?

I'm trying to get my (future) wife to get a private ticket so I meet my second pilot requirement...

Ugly? What's sexier than performance?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane
PostPosted: 08 Mar 2017, 22:08 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/11/16
Posts: 462
Post Likes: +361
Aircraft: Bonanza G36
Username Protected wrote:
Who thinks the Westwood is ugly? I've been lusting after one forever, that thing is dead sexy. I never looked harder because I figured it'd eat my lunch- maybe I should look harder.

- what's the opex?
- can you RVSM?
- can it be ADSB compliant for 2020?

I'm trying to get my (future) wife to get a private ticket so I meet my second pilot requirement...

Ugly? What's sexier than performance?


Rather than a Westwind, how about an Astra or Astra SPX? Low operating expenses. Coast to coast range. Newer than a Westwind. Gulfstream support (kind of). Faster than a Westwind. Still inexpensive to buy.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane
PostPosted: 08 Mar 2017, 22:13 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 02/05/15
Posts: 381
Post Likes: +104
Location: KSLC
Aircraft: Divorced: AC690A-10
Username Protected wrote:
Who thinks the Westwood is ugly? I've been lusting after one forever, that thing is dead sexy. I never looked harder because I figured it'd eat my lunch- maybe I should look harder.

- what's the opex?
- can you RVSM?
- can it be ADSB compliant for 2020?

I'm trying to get my (future) wife to get a private ticket so I meet my second pilot requirement...

Ugly? What's sexier than performance?


Craig,

It's probably the Aerostar lover in you coming through since they're first cousins. I never got to go to school on ours but the thing never broke and was rumored to be super simple and easy to work on when needed. You already like TPE331s and I've flown plenty of TFE731s and can tell you they are just as bullet proof. I think the 1124 has the -2s which are at the lower end of the 731 series power spectrum. 3500 lbs per side I think, maybe 3700. I have no idea about RVSM or ADSB but it was way before integrated avionics so I'm sure it would be fairly simple. (Well RVSM was never simple) So relatively simple.

If you can manage the SIC angle I think it's a real bargain.

Oh, but one thing: It is not super speedy as jets go. I think they planned ours at 420 KTAS. Go for it.

Stew


Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane
PostPosted: 08 Mar 2017, 22:32 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/29/09
Posts: 4166
Post Likes: +2988
Company: Craft Air Services, LLC
Location: Hertford, NC
Aircraft: D50A
Username Protected wrote:
Who thinks the Westwood is ugly? I've been lusting after one forever, that thing is dead sexy.
What's sexier than performance?


While no one can ever doubt the performance of the Westwind, or the gentleman pictured here, they both kind of creep me out in a hairy chest, gold medallion kind of way. Stunning performance isn't everything.

Maybe I was just too young to get the 70s vibe. :shrug:


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.

_________________
Who is John Galt?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane
PostPosted: 08 Mar 2017, 22:52 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 08/08/12
Posts: 1445
Post Likes: +940
Username Protected wrote:
Who thinks the Westwood is ugly? I've been lusting after one forever, that thing is dead sexy. I never looked harder because I figured it'd eat my lunch- maybe I should look harder.

- what's the opex?
- can you RVSM?
- can it be ADSB compliant for 2020?

I'm trying to get my (future) wife to get a private ticket so I meet my second pilot requirement...

Ugly? What's sexier than performance?


I like the Westwinds, although I have never flown one. I have flown the Astra SPX. Great airplane. Fast, long range and efficient.

Conklin DeDecker Variable costs:

IAI Astra SP $2,038
IAI Westwind 2 $2,582

Many should already be RVSM

ADS-B should be doable, probably easier in the Westwind with the steam panel.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane
PostPosted: 09 Mar 2017, 00:47 
Offline



 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/23/13
Posts: 8163
Post Likes: +10522
Company: Jet Acquisitions
Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
All depends on your budget, the Astra is inexpensive... say Champagne budget... the Westwind... beer. Cheap beer!

_________________
Winners don’t whine.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane
PostPosted: 09 Mar 2017, 02:22 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 10/28/11
Posts: 1368
Post Likes: +600
Aircraft: V35A, B300
RVSM STC exists for Astra and Westwind. Astra is item 15 and Westwind is item 18.

http://www.cmdflightsolutions.com/inclu ... CH-web.pdf


Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane
PostPosted: 09 Mar 2017, 05:07 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 06/09/09
Posts: 4438
Post Likes: +3304
Aircraft: C182P, Merlin IIIC
One of my Merlin instructors was the guru of Westwind in aircraft training, he was killed in one at Huntsville. He pushed me to dropmthebMerlin and buy a Westwind back then. Had I done so I would have really lost a bundle as those jets were going for a million or a bit less then and now you see them going for 250k.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane
PostPosted: 09 Mar 2017, 12:06 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/24/14
Posts: 1911
Post Likes: +2629
Good thread here about the Astra and little bit about the Westwind...

viewtopic.php?f=49&t=107758&hilit=astra

_________________
Jay


Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane
PostPosted: 09 Mar 2017, 14:00 
Offline



 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/23/13
Posts: 8163
Post Likes: +10522
Company: Jet Acquisitions
Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
Username Protected wrote:
One of my Merlin instructors was the guru of Westwind in aircraft training, he was killed in one at Huntsville. He pushed me to dropmthebMerlin and buy a Westwind back then. Had I done so I would have really lost a bundle as those jets were going for a million or a bit less then and now you see them going for 250k.


Yes! Great example of an airplane about to fall... but I don't think anyone saw that one coming. I know a dealer who had one in inventory, I would guess he lost $1 Million dollars when he sold that airplane. Painful.

Premier I / IA's fell... then they went back up.

The used aircraft market is hard to predict... if I had a crystal ball...

_________________
Winners don’t whine.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane
PostPosted: 10 Mar 2017, 01:25 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20445
Post Likes: +25733
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
But... the point is a lot of these legacy aircraft are just not popular anymore. It's not something to be defensive about... it's just reality.

It's your reality. It seems to be generated by the need to scare people away from planes you don't sell.

I have a long list of "if you ever sell, call me first" people for my plane.

Maybe popular is "like it so much I'm not selling".

That list you provided looks like an excellent opportunity for owner operators to pick up some very nice airplanes. The advantage to these legacy airplanes is that you can upgrade them for much less than the newer "integrated" electronic cockpits of the newer planes.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 218 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 15  Next



B-Kool (Top/Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.wilco-85x100.png.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.aircraftassociates-85x50.png.
.midwest2.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.AAI.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.Latitude.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.concorde.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.