01 Jul 2025, 09:40 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Virgin’s Boom SST Order Goes Kaboom Posted: 10 Jul 2023, 20:52 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 06/17/14 Posts: 5919 Post Likes: +2666 Location: KJYO
Aircraft: C-182, GA-7
|
|
I am happy sitting in the back while the folks up front cruise at .88 or .92 at about 10% of the price getting there 2x faster.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Virgin’s Boom SST Order Goes Kaboom Posted: 10 Jul 2023, 22:24 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20395 Post Likes: +25585 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I am happy sitting in the back while the folks up front cruise at .88 or .92 at about 10% of the price getting there 2x faster. At present, the supersonic folks are moving at about 0 knots. I wouldn't be so sure they will go 2x faster, ever. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Virgin’s Boom SST Order Goes Kaboom Posted: 11 Jul 2023, 01:05 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 06/17/14 Posts: 5919 Post Likes: +2666 Location: KJYO
Aircraft: C-182, GA-7
|
|
I don’t see them doing it ever again in my lifetime.
Seeing the Concorde on the ground at Dulles is impressive. It is hard to imagine the amount of fuel that guzzled in order to go fast.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Virgin’s Boom SST Order Goes Kaboom Posted: 11 Jul 2023, 05:51 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/22/08 Posts: 3092 Post Likes: +1054 Company: USAF Propulsion Laboratory Location: Dayton, OH
Aircraft: PA24, AEST 680, 421
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I don’t see them doing it ever again in my lifetime.
Seeing the Concorde on the ground at Dulles is impressive. It is hard to imagine the amount of fuel that guzzled in order to go fast. New designs will not guzzle as much as the Concorde, though they will use more fuel than subsonic aircraft. Interesting how capital flows into these concepts. Aerion was going full speed ahead till it went bust. Boom has some orders, but not a large qty. It is a niche market.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Virgin’s Boom SST Order Goes Kaboom Posted: 11 Jul 2023, 12:53 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 06/17/14 Posts: 5919 Post Likes: +2666 Location: KJYO
Aircraft: C-182, GA-7
|
|
Honestly, I thought Gulfstream might have had the first SSBJ on the market and their "Whisper" nose spike being tested on the F-18 was promising. Granted, the G650 and G700 have been approved, in flight test, for Mach 0.99. That's not Mach 2 but I imagine that there is a Mach 1 record somewhere that we don't know about. Hopefully they beat Bombardier, safely, to the punch. https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news ... gulfstreamOtherwise, Bombardier's Global 7500 has been the first "SSBJ" as it broke Mach 1 in testing and the 8000 will be the first to hit Mach 1 but the article is not clear if they will certify it at .94 with conditions where 1.015 would be approved. https://www.thenationalnews.com/travel/ ... -of-sound/
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Virgin’s Boom SST Order Goes Kaboom Posted: 11 Jul 2023, 13:52 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/15/17 Posts: 1125 Post Likes: +582 Company: Cessna (retired)
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Honestly, I thought Gulfstream might have had the first SSBJ on the market and their "Whisper" nose spike being tested on the F-18 was promising. Granted, the G650 and G700 have been approved, in flight test, for Mach 0.99. That's not Mach 2 but I imagine that there is a Mach 1 record somewhere that we don't know about. Hopefully they beat Bombardier, safely, to the punch. https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news ... gulfstreamOtherwise, Bombardier's Global 7500 has been the first "SSBJ" as it broke Mach 1 in testing and the 8000 will be the first to hit Mach 1 but the article is not clear if they will certify it at .94 with conditions where 1.015 would be approved. https://www.thenationalnews.com/travel/ ... -of-sound/It was said that the Citation X barely cracked Mach 1 in dive tests. I didn't/don't have enough knowledge of airspeed corrections at these speeds to assess the accuracy of this.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Virgin’s Boom SST Order Goes Kaboom Posted: 11 Jul 2023, 14:25 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/05/16 Posts: 3137 Post Likes: +2284 Company: Tack Mobile Location: KBJC
Aircraft: C441
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Honestly, I thought Gulfstream might have had the first SSBJ on the market and their "Whisper" nose spike being tested on the F-18 was promising. Granted, the G650 and G700 have been approved, in flight test, for Mach 0.99. That's not Mach 2 but I imagine that there is a Mach 1 record somewhere that we don't know about. Hopefully they beat Bombardier, safely, to the punch. https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news ... gulfstreamOtherwise, Bombardier's Global 7500 has been the first "SSBJ" as it broke Mach 1 in testing and the 8000 will be the first to hit Mach 1 but the article is not clear if they will certify it at .94 with conditions where 1.015 would be approved. https://www.thenationalnews.com/travel/ ... -of-sound/It was said that the Citation X barely cracked Mach 1 in dive tests. I didn't/don't have enough knowledge of airspeed corrections at these speeds to assess the accuracy of this.
I believe most fast bizjets are required to exceed mach 1 in dive certification testing, back pretty far (1980s?), to establish safety margins. In any case the Global 8000 was definitely not the first.
I think the airflow over the wing in most fast business jets is partly supersonic and part subsonic (transonic), and it gradually transitions to fully supersonic as you get closer to 1.0. So for fast jets the wings are designed to have some portion of supersonic flow during normal cruise.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Virgin’s Boom SST Order Goes Kaboom Posted: 11 Jul 2023, 19:59 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/23/08 Posts: 7357 Post Likes: +4088 Company: AssuredPartners Aerospace Phx. Location: KDVT, 46U
Aircraft: IAR823, LrJet, 240Z
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I was listening to a neat podcast on the technical side of Hypersonics and SuperSonics. For the nerds: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/f ... 0607131566Took me a few days to get through my own podcast recommendation but it is really fascinating if you like this sort of thing. Lots of great analogies to Piper Cherokee, Water through a hose, Cars in a traffic jam etc. Take-away: It is really hard. It makes me think: Why bother with atmospheric flying at all? Just go around!
_________________ Tom Johnson-Az/Wy AssuredPartners Aerospace Insurance Tj.Johnson@AssuredPartners.com C: 602-628-2701
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Virgin’s Boom SST Order Goes Kaboom Posted: 11 Jul 2023, 20:17 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/18/13 Posts: 727 Post Likes: +592 Location: Tampa, FL
Aircraft: 2020 Gamebird GB1
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Boom is not likely to advance past the vaporware stage. ^Is “the vaporware stage” where the money turns into vapor?^ Butch
_________________ The only way to make more time is to go faster. 2020 Gamebird GB1 2015 Lockwood AirCam KTPF/KVDF
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Virgin’s Boom SST Order Goes Kaboom Posted: 11 Jul 2023, 23:08 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/24/18 Posts: 616 Post Likes: +702 Location: KHFD
Aircraft: F33A
|
|
One of my very young colleagues went to work for Boom several years ago. We couldn't understand the allure, as the propulsion company I worked for had been approached by several startups over the decades with big dreams and little understanding of what's involved. On occasion, the startup would announce one of my employer's engines as the baseline offering. This news would send the sales department scurrying to the president's office to swear on a stack of bibles that they had never heard of the startup, let alone talk to them. Mostly, though, the discussions took one of three paths: 1) we'd like to buy 100 of X model engine. Response: that model has been out of production for 20 years and few aircraft powered by these engines are still operational. All of the production tooling is long gone. Unless you have the financial resources to commit to 1000+ units plus restart costs, there's no way we are restarting this production line 2) OK, will you design a brand new supersonic centerline engine for us? Response: if you front us a few billion, we'll consider it, however, we're not going to use our money for an obvious niche market that will never sell enough units to cover research and development costs 3) Understood, Can we get a demilitarized version of the engines you are providing for our country's front line fighters? Response: Are you f'ing kidding? Yeah, I've had a front row seat for this rodeo many times....it never ceases to amuse and entertain. Art
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|