07 Nov 2025, 12:38 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: 2005 TBM 700C2 versus 2008 Cessna Mustang Posted: 09 Dec 2012, 22:12 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 06/23/09 Posts: 2320 Post Likes: +720 Location: KIKK......Kankakee, Illinois
Aircraft: TBM 850
|
|
|
Any concerns about a second engine?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: 2005 TBM 700C2 versus 2008 Cessna Mustang Posted: 09 Dec 2012, 22:17 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/03/08 Posts: 16153 Post Likes: +8870 Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Any concerns about a second engine? Beyond the cost, no. Do you already have any jet type ratings ?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: 2005 TBM 700C2 versus 2008 Cessna Mustang Posted: 09 Dec 2012, 22:26 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 06/23/09 Posts: 2320 Post Likes: +720 Location: KIKK......Kankakee, Illinois
Aircraft: TBM 850
|
|
|
No type ratings. Russ sorry we never met. We have been based here since 2006. Prior to that we were at KJOT. I realize statistically these planes are very close safety wise. I dunno but I think a little redundancy would make me feel better.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: 2005 TBM 700C2 versus 2008 Cessna Mustang Posted: 09 Dec 2012, 22:34 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/03/08 Posts: 16153 Post Likes: +8870 Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: No type ratings. To fly the jet, you'll have to get from your current flying to passing an ATP checkride in a jet for the PIC type-rating. To fly the TBM, you'll have to pass the insurance prescribed combination of sim and in-plane training.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: 2005 TBM 700C2 versus 2008 Cessna Mustang Posted: 09 Dec 2012, 22:48 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 06/23/09 Posts: 2320 Post Likes: +720 Location: KIKK......Kankakee, Illinois
Aircraft: TBM 850
|
|
|
No doubt would be easier to do the single engine training. A friend of mine has a Mustang.......with Fadec seems easier than the TNG36 I currently fly? Totally speaking from a naive perspective.............
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: 2005 TBM 700C2 versus 2008 Cessna Mustang Posted: 09 Dec 2012, 23:11 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/29/10 Posts: 1569 Post Likes: +523 Location: Houston, TX USA
Aircraft: Learjet
|
|
Username Protected wrote: No type ratings. To fly the jet, you'll have to get from your current flying to passing an ATP checkride in a jet for the PIC type-rating. To fly the TBM, you'll have to pass the insurance prescribed combination of sim and in-plane training.
Someone I know just bought a PC-12. Every insurance company required initial training at Flightsafety or similar as well as annual recurrent training.
The only difference between what they went through and the Mustang training is a checkride with the FAA or a DPE (If you don't think you can handle an ATP checkride, then you don't have any business flying either airplane).
I think it would be crazy for someone to go with a TBM over a Mustang for that reason. (unless you were going self insured, in which case I guess you wouldn't need to go to Flightsafety every year)
If you are going to be operating out of short strips, carrying heavy loads, or need extra long legs, go with the TBM. Otherwise, Mustang wins it.
_________________ Destroyer of the world’s finest aircraft since 1985.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: 2005 TBM 700C2 versus 2008 Cessna Mustang Posted: 09 Dec 2012, 23:20 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/31/09 Posts: 5193 Post Likes: +3038 Location: Northern NJ
Aircraft: SR22;CJ2+;C510
|
|
Username Protected wrote: No doubt would be easier to do the single engine training. A friend of mine has a Mustang.......with Fadec seems easier than the TNG36 I currently fly? Totally speaking from a naive perspective............. As others have pointed out you are required to make a greater commitment to training for the Mustang then the TBM. You need to get your type rating, some mentoring, a SP type rating, and annual 61.58 checks. If you want the equivalent level of safety then you should be doing that level of training regardless of aircraft. Many folks have stepped up from SE Pistons to the Mustang. It is doable and insurance can be had for a reasonable cost. The insurance recognizes you will be flying for a while as crew until you get your SP type rating. When everything is working it is a simple aircraft to fly. You do have to get used to managing a greater speed range of 80 to 360kts (over 4X) then you have with your Bo. Once you see how well the Mustang flies when it loses one engine you will wonder what your situation would be with the TBM when it loses one engine.
_________________ Allen
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: 2005 TBM 700C2 versus 2008 Cessna Mustang Posted: 10 Dec 2012, 11:17 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/22/10 Posts: 726 Post Likes: +11 Location: Montgomery, TX
Aircraft: Baron 58P
|
|
|
What is the single engine performance like in the Mustang?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|