banner
banner

21 Jun 2025, 17:09 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Garmin International (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Citation 501SP - Sim schools or aircraft for hire
PostPosted: 19 Feb 2025, 11:48 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20365
Post Likes: +25546
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
Legal? Probably.

Basis for that?

If a person does the training and checkride all single pilot, I see no basis for the DPE arbitrarily issuing "SIC required" on their license.

A pilot trained only in single pilot ops is actually not that safe in a crew situation. Being an effective crew requires specific training for that.

Quote:
Until the FAA sort out the common type mess and split the SP Citations into their own type rating (which CJP were trying to make happen but it seems to have died off) then this will keep happening.

I was really disappointed with the death of the CE-500S type rating initiative. Apparently, it died at Textron's door step. I am pushing for CJP to open up about this effort and why it failed, and see if we can work around the barriers.

Quote:
Other jurisdictions - Australia being my other interest - they actually have two type ratings - the CE500 series (Single Pilot) and the CE500 series (2 pilot). It probably achieves the same outcome for a new-to-jets pilot but at least its clear where you stand.

That makes so much more sense.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501SP - Sim schools or aircraft for hire
PostPosted: 19 Feb 2025, 11:56 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/01/15
Posts: 974
Post Likes: +998
Location: Hayward, CA
Aircraft: D50E
And I should have added that I totally understand that it might be a “cover your butt” maneuver on the part of the DPE. I may have to read the FAA order to figure out why they legally have that latitude.

Cheers,
Martín (deputy minister of geared piston Lycomings, for now)


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501SP - Sim schools or aircraft for hire
PostPosted: 19 Feb 2025, 13:49 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 06/16/10
Posts: 144
Post Likes: +54
Location: Toronto, Canada
Aircraft: 601P
When I say "legal" - I mean that the DPE will always be able to manufacture a reason why you didn't do the checkride as the sole manipulator of the controls/pilot if that's their intended outcome.

Martin - yes, I guess it does then technically count as a failed SP checkride but only if the DPE hasn't advised you prior. At least it wouldn't go on your record as such.

Mike - agreed - it seems perverse that you can train in SP or 2P and then go and fly the other with no need to prove that you're capable of flying in the "other" environment. DPEs are self-governing(?) the 2P to SP move and I suppose if you go from SP to 2P then maybe it's the insurers who will do the due diligence?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501SP - Sim schools or aircraft for hire
PostPosted: 19 Feb 2025, 16:48 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/01/15
Posts: 974
Post Likes: +998
Location: Hayward, CA
Aircraft: D50E
Username Protected wrote:
When I say "legal" - I mean that the DPE will always be able to manufacture a reason why you didn't do the checkride as the sole manipulator of the controls/pilot if that's their intended outcome.

Martin - yes, I guess it does then technically count as a failed SP checkride but only if the DPE hasn't advised you prior. At least it wouldn't go on your record as such.

Mike - agreed - it seems perverse that you can train in SP or 2P and then go and fly the other with no need to prove that you're capable of flying in the "other" environment. DPEs are self-governing(?) the 2P to SP move and I suppose if you go from SP to 2P then maybe it's the insurers who will do the due diligence?


Yeah, I agree…they can always find some nit to pick, so I guess it’s better that they tell you in advance that he won’t grant you SP authorization.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501SP - Sim schools or aircraft for hire
PostPosted: 19 Feb 2025, 18:50 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/06/20
Posts: 1635
Post Likes: +1697
Location: Tulsa, OK - KRVS
Aircraft: C501SP
Current 501SP driver here. I will second Mike's suggestions. I did my initial as crew (in-airplane), flew with a mentor for a year, then did my 61.58 single pilot and had the SOC required removed.
Username Protected wrote:
I’m a bit curious about a point that was raised. How is it that DPEs can deny you single-pilot authorization? On other checkrides, say AMEL or instrument, if you meet the requirements and performed to the PTS, the DPE approves you. Do they in fact have discretionary authority to fail you just because they don’t think you should be granted the privileges of that rating?

Have you read the ACS? There is a TON of latitude to the DPE in there. How about this one:
Quote:
AA.III.A.S9: Maintain centerline (ASEL, AMEL) and proper flight control inputs during the takeoff roll.

How far off centerline can you go? ACS doesn't say. No one can stay perfectly on centerline so literally any wobble could be grounds for failure.

What about appropriate use of checklists? There is also latitude there. Same for emergency procedures - the V1 cut actually lists +/-5 degrees but the other skills just say "maintain directional control."

The bottom line is that if a DPE wants to fail you they can find a reason - even if you're Chuck Yeager. Especially on a person's first type ride which is done to ATP standards. The inverse is also true. Generally, DPEs are wanting you to pass and you have to make a cut and dry mistake and/or give them a bad feeling before they fail you.

They should definitely be upfront about this, but they also have to be careful. A DPE can't tell a person that they'll fail a checkride before they've taken it. So you have to read between the lines a bit.

In my case it didn't cost me any extra as I waited until my annual 61.58 to remove the SP but not everyone will want to deal with a mentor for a full year.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501SP - Sim schools or aircraft for hire
PostPosted: 19 Feb 2025, 21:59 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20365
Post Likes: +25546
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
The bottom line is that if a DPE wants to fail you they can find a reason

You either pass the checkride operating as a single pilot or you don't. If you do it single pilot, then no SIC is required. If you did it crew, then you get SIC required.

I don't see any latitude for a DPE to pass you but then put SIC required if you did it single pilot.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501SP - Sim schools or aircraft for hire
PostPosted: 20 Feb 2025, 11:31 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/27/16
Posts: 2306
Post Likes: +3900
Aircraft: B17,18,24,25,29,58,
Username Protected wrote:
I know for a fact this still happens today - I spoke to a school who were very up front with me and said that their DPE will discuss with you on the day your background and experience and tell you what they're prepared to grant - irrespective of who touches what controls. They all but said that if it's your first jet type (as mine would be) then there's almost no chance they'll give the rating without the second pilot required restriction.


Thanks. That was at the heart of my question: If the airplane is a single-pilot airplane, and I meet the requirements, and I perform to the standard, why does the DPE have the discretion to issue me a SIC required type rating? That is essentially saying I failed the SP checkride. My background and experiences shouldn’t come into it as long as I meet the requirement as laid out in the regs.

I’m not disputing that this happens, and I understand that it’s not hard to remove the SIC restriction. I’m just trying to understand what gives the DPE that latitude, when in the case of other checkrides, it’s more cut-and-dried.


DPE’s get sued sometimes when airplanes crash. The FAA offers no help to them whatsoever when this happens. Any DPE can decline any checkride at his or her discretion for any reason.

The single pilot first jet issue occasionally exposes over enthusiastic pilots that don’t know what they don’t know.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501SP - Sim schools or aircraft for hire
PostPosted: 20 Feb 2025, 14:30 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/06/20
Posts: 1635
Post Likes: +1697
Location: Tulsa, OK - KRVS
Aircraft: C501SP
Username Protected wrote:
The bottom line is that if a DPE wants to fail you they can find a reason

You either pass the checkride operating as a single pilot or you don't. If you do it single pilot, then no SIC is required. If you did it crew, then you get SIC required.

I don't see any latitude for a DPE to pass you but then put SIC required if you did it single pilot.

That's my point. If the DPE doesn't want you to pass the checkride as single pilot, you WON'T pass or as Charles mentioned, they can just decline to give the checkride if you insist on doing it single pilot.

Hopefully they are upfront by saying something like, "I highly recommend you do your initial as a crew" or some such thing. My instructor, who only works with one DPE and they are very close, just told me straight up that there was effectively no way that the DPE would pass me single pilot on my initial.

Everyone's getting wrapped around the axle on this issue but everyone has agreed that some amount of mentor time is critical, not to mention insurance will require it. Yes, there's an extra cost to doing an extra 61.58 (or to keeping a mentor for a full year as I did) to remove the SIC required once you have completed your mentor time but it's a one-time thing and it's currently the cost of doing business. You may find a DPE who will accept your pinky swear that you won't fly single pilot until such and such time but based on all of the discussions here and on CJP I don't think there is such a person.

Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2



PWI, Inc. (Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.Wingman 85x50.png.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.AAI.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.daytona.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.SCA.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.dbm.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.