09 Nov 2025, 10:33 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 14 posts ] |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: SpaceX: RUD (Rapid Unscheduled Disassembly) Event Posted: 16 Jan 2015, 17:58 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20735 Post Likes: +26204 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: SpaceX's attempt to land on their barge, ended with a RUD (Rapid Unscheduled Disassembly). They ran out of hydraulic fluid in some control system. They say they will have more for next try. I wouldn't say the event was unscheduled per se, destruction of the first stage has been the norm. They gave it only 50% chance of success on first try anyway. I think it is remarkable they recovered the first stage to ALMOST land it. it is miles up and going supersonic and they guide it back to a location and nearly zero velocity. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: SpaceX: RUD (Rapid Unscheduled Disassembly) Event Posted: 17 Jan 2015, 03:07 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20735 Post Likes: +26204 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: They sure weren't quite as loudmouthed about that event An experiment that was trying something new, land a first stage to reuse it, almost did that, and everything else about the mission was a success. Quote: as they were about the Orbital mishap last fall. Total mission failure in every way. Vehicle and payload destroyed, launch pad damaged. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: SpaceX: RUD (Rapid Unscheduled Disassembly) Event Posted: 17 Jan 2015, 12:14 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 10/20/09 Posts: 5260 Post Likes: +246
|
|
|
50 years ago, if a young NASA engineer suggested that we try to recycle the the first stage by landing on a barge, they would have been passed off as nuts.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: SpaceX: RUD (Rapid Unscheduled Disassembly) Event Posted: 18 Jan 2015, 16:03 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20735 Post Likes: +26204 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Does anyone know why they'd use an open hydraulic system instead of a closed loop? To save weight and to be more reliable, no pump required, runs from pressurized nitrogen pushing fluid. Waste hydraulic fluid is dumped into the engines and burned as fuel. In fact, it is RP-1, a kerosene like fuel similar to jet fuel. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: SpaceX: RUD (Rapid Unscheduled Disassembly) Event Posted: 19 Jan 2015, 14:52 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/30/09 Posts: 6025 Post Likes: +3389 Location: Oklahoma City, OK (KPWA)
Aircraft: planeless
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Not sure I'd call that a stabilized approach. Agreed. Looked like an airline pilot with an inop autopilot.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 14 posts ] |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|